THE TEMASEK TIMES

News and views from an unique perspective

Women’s group supports charging of 48 men and imposing gag order on identity of underage prostitute Miss XXX

Posted by temasektimes on April 25, 2012

The high profile prostitution case which has led to 48 men being charged so far for having sex with the same underage prostitute has led to some Singaporeans to question the rationale behind protecting her identity.

Prominent criminal lawyer Subhas Anandan went as far as condemning her publicly as a ‘hardcore prostitute’ who deserved no protection from the law.

However, one women’s group has stepped forward to lend public support to the authorities for doing so.

In a press statement released today, the Singapore Committee for UN Women or Unifem Singapore says it is heartened by “the government’s commitment to curb such activities and protect vulnerable young people from exploitation”.

“These laws place the onus on adults to act responsibly, lawfully and refrain from engaging in undesirable acts, especially with minors,” said the statement.

It added that it supports the decision to impose a gag order to prevent external parties from revealing the identity of the girl involved, who is now known as Miss XXX in the media.

Among the 48 men already charged include 9 civil servants, a senior banker, a company director, a senior vice-president of a private company, lawyers, a senior police officer, the former principal of Pei Chun Public School Lee Lip Hong and prominent grassroots leader and high-ranking MOE official Chua Ren Cheng. Their ages range from between 21 to 48 years old.

The prostitute was 17 years old at that time she had sex with the men and she reportedly kept a detailed diary documenting meticulously and clearly the time and place she was bonked which will be used as evidence to prosecute her ex-clients.

Meanwhile, she is now free to continue prostituting herself and keep her earnings as she is now above the legal age to have sex with men.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Related articles:

Underage prostitute kept sex diary of bonking sessions with men

Man accused of having sex with underage prostitute writes to Tan Kin Lian seeking his help

Underage prostitute to testify in court against ex-clients

High society sex scandal with underage prostitute: A young man speaks his mind

Porn site exposes identity of underage prostitute

Chua Ren Cheng promised to patronize freelance prostitutes frequently with two other teachers

Senior lawyer and SAF officer to be charged for having sex with underage girl

Indonesian charged with having sex with underage prostitute allowed to leave Singapore

Chua Ren Cheng was a Head of Department at Ministry of Education

Tang Boon Thiew paid only $50 to have sex with underage prostitute

Teo Ser Luck defends underage prostitute: She is young and deserves to be protected

Former grassroots leader and teacher Chua Ren Cheng charged for having sex with underage prostitute

Polytechnic prostitute had marathon sex with 4 men in one day

PHOTOS: 17 year old polytechnic student cum prostitute with C cup breasts

Ex-principal Lee Lip Hong paid underage prostitute $1,000 to have sex twice with her

Subhas Anandan: She is a HARDCORE prostitute who deserves no protection

PHOTOS: Some clients of underage prostitute

Ex-police superintendent Jarrod Song charged for having sex with minor

Pimp Tang Boon Thiew set up model agency to recruit girls for prostitution

List of 44 men charged for having sex with underage prostitutes

Ex-principal of Pei Chun Public School Lee Lip Hong charged for having sex with underage prostitute

60 men may be charged for having sex with underage teen model

Senior Vice President patronized teen prostitute thrice due to excellent serevices

Teacher jailed for asking student to masturbate him

Allied educator charged for asking girl to touch his ‘balls’

Teacher jailed 10 years for having oral sex with student

Male teacher arrested for outrage of modesty

32 Responses to “Women’s group supports charging of 48 men and imposing gag order on identity of underage prostitute Miss XXX”

  1. Bulls said

    Women’s group endorses, encourages and embraces teen prostitution,
    Whore pride.

    • boo said

      This has nothing to do with women’s group embracing prostitution, it lies with home education. But then again, the women’s group should really keep their mouth shut cause this whole incident has nothing to do with them. And, perhaps re-evaluate their efforts on educating and extending counseling services to their female youth counterparts.

      • Bulls said

        What home education you talking?
        This article is about a society of fanny owners who support the idea of illegal prostitution and believes that she should be protected and go unpunished despite being underaged and selling her CB at time of offence.

        With such backing, many aspiring prostitutes below 18 will feel very inspired to make big bucks at a young age, they can start at 12 legally with fanny club’s support and be a millionaire by 20.

        All perfectly legal even when caught, only the men gets fucked for failing to recognise an unriped whore.

  2. Tim said

    http://www.straitstimes.com/The-Big-Story/The-Big-Story-1/Story/STIStory_792411.html.

    So it started with 80 men..then 48 charged…32 more to go..
    Suddenly now ST says is down to 62 men, so is 62-48 = 14 men left.
    What happened to the mysterious 18 from the original 80? Was there some heavy weight col or elites who managed to pay/flee/negotiate their way out?
    This case is too shady….no full transparency.

    • Singaporean said

      Agreed!! No full transparency at all.. The remaining must be someone very powerful elites that can use $$ or reputation to buy freedom.. Who knows maybe is those very very very high post in our gahmen..

    • pworama@gmail.com said

      We can easily find out who are the men exempted from the prosecution. Since the log-book (which was meticulously kept by the prostitute) was a material evidence against all the men, the defence lawyer has the right to ask the prosecution to provide this evidence for examination. Once this log-book is available to the defence lawyer or the public we will know for sure who were the lucky men exempted.
      We can then investigate whether these lucky men have got enough merits to be so exempted.

  3. brudder said

    they are bringing in the UNIFEM women group now because they want to protect the girl’s identity.
    so they need to use them as political bargaining chip with the citizens..i don’t buy that.
    this girl has nothing to lose at all (since her identity is protected by law) so why did she have to spill to begin with?
    clearly they are trying to prevent people getting through to her…why? because she would have a longer list than the 80???
    maybe she even knows more than 80 that got away…
    there are some deals being made with the devils clearly.

  4. pay said

    You cannot stop the subhas…

  5. Mee Pok Man said

    Women’s Charter is a hypocritical, self-righteous, self-serving group.
    WC ‘try’ to fight for ‘equality’, but its making them look even more hypocritical. It inevitably creates tension between Men and Women, further widens the equality gap, and increases men’s discrimination of women in society.

  6. TMD said

    I think this women group is encouraging prostitution of underage girl. They speakibg up for the sake of speaking. Don’t they feel shame of being women? So are they also protecting female prostitutes? Any way, the girl’s identity already disclosed by the gutteruncensored blog. Is the socalled women protection group going to take action on it? If not, then its role of protectiong women is questionable.

  7. jhontan62 said

    The easiest way to avoid being charged for sex with the minor is to deny any penetration. The law makes it an offence only if there is penetration, either normally or orally or anally. There is no offence if the man cannot erect, or he gets for only assisted masturbation or massage service from the girl.
    Presumably, inside the private bedroom with only the girl and the man involved there is no way that the prosecution can prove that there was penetration. Moreover, it is also in the interest of the girl (to enable her to continue her lucrative business) if she corroborates with the man that there was no penetration, just play play only.
    Would someone care to confirm this?

  8. loral milor said

    What if all these Temasek sites are run by PRCs? … http://i.imgur.com/ikhON.jpg

  9. Mr T said

    “These laws place the onus on adults to act responsibly, lawfully and refrain from engaging in undesirable acts, especially with minors,” said the statement. -QUOTE-

    When the men engaged in sexual relationship with the prostitute. They all believed that the girl was at Legal age. They paid, it’s a transaction. Have they known that the girl was only 17, there could be a possibility that all those men would not have sex with her. Thus, the Singapore Committee for UN Women is just saying for the sake of saying something. All the men had the original intention to pay for sex from a 18 yr old prostitute which is legal in Singapore. So please don’t put salt on their wounds and say things without thinking.

    Those men were cheated, betrayed, shamed. For life. Those men were victims as well.

    I’m not defending the men, but just put things into perspective and you would just see how bystanders just want to step on someone some more when they’re already kissing the floor.

    • Old Singaporean said

      With that slutty face, who but devil knows her real age.

      • law have human touch said

        you are right. If she had committed so many times, that he is no more underage.

        law is not judge by law, must be judge with human factor!

  10. 大陆仔 said

    病入高忘荒!
    仙丹都没有救。
    色字头上一把刀。
    色不亦空空不亦色....
    回头是岸,重修正果以报父母思.

  11. yenny said

    like the last sentence.

  12. God said

    Protect vulnerable young people from such exploitations ? They brainless or what ? Not like the men cheat the prostitute into having sex with them.

    • lee david said

      well said, not that i agreed minor sex, but like i said before, ONE WILLING SELLER, ONE WILLING BUYER. it is the people who does not pay n force sex that the POLICE, WOMEN RIGHT GROUP should be going after…

  13. Kelvin Tay said

    the underage prostitute is no longer underage now..why still protect her?…

  14. Jackie said

    Women’s groups support women by default, regardless the merits of the case. To them, equal rights means having the law in their favour, having all the privileges and none of the responsibilities that comes with equal rights. They probably also keep secret savings while critising their husbands if husbands don’t share everything. Women’s groups are all the same. You could give them the world, and they would still think you are cheating them.

  15. Oracle said

    Whatever the ban on revealing photos and the name of the under-aged prostitute, Miss XXX.
    Unfortunately, not so easy to control the Internet – her name and photos are common kbowlefge now her name indicates she is from a teochew family ( this dialect group are traditionally very conservative, i feel sorry for the family as the relatives will be tsk tsking all the way) and even which ITE she comes from

  16. Oracle said

    Whatever the ban on revealing photos and the name of the under-aged prostitute, Miss XXX.
    Unfortunately, not so easy to control the Internet – her name and photos are common kbowlefge now her name indicates she is from a teochew family ( this dialect group are traditionally very conservative, i feel sorry for the family as the relatives will be tsk tsking all the way) and even which ITE she comes from !

  17. Family Man said

    UNIFEM is and has always been a joke…..

  18. learn how to think said

    this women group do not know how to think?
    They should be send to learn how to think.

    • Helen said

      I totally agree with u. This is because none of their family members fall under the name list. If one of the 48 man happens to be someone related to them. They won’t make this silly comment anymore. 16 and above can have sex but with money involve must be 18 above. Does that mean if the man don’t pay the hooker after sex, then he won’t be charged? I thought the law is must have evidence to proof they did commit it then can charged them. I personally feel that this law is not right. The principal is been jailed 9 weeks. Y not given a second chance y must destroy people like that. He is such a lousy judge. I am now worried for my 2 sons, will it still be safe to stay in Singapore or shall we migrate, I had been asking many husband every now and then. We can see a lot of molest cases almost everyday. A man was jailed for 9 months for touching a policewoman bum. How come the judge can have the heart to pass this sentence just because the man made a remark saying he has no problem finding girls due to his good looking face. I think the judge has taken this case very personal and bias.

  19. WGF said

    Why are people having such a one-sided comments stating that is the 48 men that is being charged have sex with her at faults? Why isn’t things like all this started because she chose this line. Let’s say that under age prostitute has a boyfriend, I definitely believe her family and the boyfriend is unable to accept how “USED” she is.

  20. Alan Lau said

    i tell u guys, this is known as the “Women of Convenience” … everything is they dictate and they have an unspoken rule … “Women must not comment on another women” thats y every generation of women is getting shittier

  21. hahaha said

    I watch this whole saga unfold with bewilderment… I can only come to one statement to conclude the whole thing.
    “Girls, if you are under 18 and have a need to satisfy your needs for materialism, go and entice some men who are careless enough to patronize you when you prostitute yourself because the law will protect you even when the whole matter is exposed.”

    Come on… whoever it is needs to do an IQ test to come up with such a stupid decision to ‘morbidly protect’ the source of trouble.

  22. “Meanwhile, she is now free to continue prostituting herself and keep her earnings as she is now above the legal age to have sex with men.”

    So, no punishment for the girl who knowingly prostituting herself while underaged? I agreed that her identity should be protected as she is still a minor, but protecting identity is one thing but she should also be punished to deter others from following her route again. What a sexist law… damn

  23. Raising Hell said

    Spinster groups always have a comment for everytime. Of course they will welcome this. Look at the positions of these 48 men, most of them are high ranked. And this is their chance to get rid of 48 at one go, of course the spinster’s group are happy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,098 other followers

%d bloggers like this: