THE TEMASEK TIMES

News and views from an unique perspective

Clarification from Sentosa Leisure Group on alleged rape case

Posted by temasektimes on May 11, 2012

Sentosa Leisure Group has sent us an email in response to an earlier article published yesterday on its part-time staff being allegedly involved in a rape case at Sentosa beach.

Its manager wrote that they can only confirm the employee in question is a part-time staff and not whether if he is a foreigner or local.

 

13 Responses to “Clarification from Sentosa Leisure Group on alleged rape case”

  1. Ken Lee said

    ONE MILLION MORE! YOU WILL GET USE TO IT!

  2. What kind of “clarification” is this? Rape case means rape case.

  3. Stirrer said

    What kind of clarification is that?
    First it was reported as Indian FT, now they “clarify” they are not sure which animal was it??

  4. C.H. Tan said

    Yet again another cheapo company only looking for cheap sfaff.. There are alot of life guard in singapore and why Sentosa L G employ such type of people. Understand every year there are still water and open water Champ. competition and why non of the people are ask to take up part time. Ahha. it is because there are to expensive to employ and FT are cheap.

  5. Blood suckers said

    If not, then why the Sentosa leisure group don’t openly clarify what is the nationality of that rapist.

  6. speechless said

    huh? they need to ask the staff if he is a ft or local? i thought he say they got to hire ft for this job coz local dun wan do?

  7. tccs said

    catch no ball? Sentosa need to explain what was the discrepancy between TRE article and its own statement to the press mah.

  8. Emeritus Wannabe said

    Are there too many of the same kinds in their midst that they are not sure of which?

  9. FR said

    Dear Ms Zee,

    #1 Why are you contacting TNP and Shinmin when the report came from Lianhe Wanbao?

    http://news.insing.com/tabloid/woman-cries-rape-on-sentosa-beach/id-99473f00

    #2 Who is responsible for the initial fact that he is “an Indian national”?

    #3 If the fact that he is a “part-time life guard” is correct, how likely is it that the fact supplied from the same source of him being “an Indian national” is not correct?

    Look forward to your reply here.

  10. FR said

    #4 “We would like to request for a correction to the quote attributed…”

    May I ask what was the actual quote that Suzanne Ho actually said?

  11. Invictus said

    Aiyoh Sentosa, you can tell us that the staff is a part timer and works on an ad-hoc basis. You can even inform us that he is required to ‘assist’ police in a rape case. Obviously you know who he is. And yet now mysteriously you can tell if he’s FT or local ? Very odd HR system you have, no ??

  12. Unquestionably believe that which you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the web the simplest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get irked while people consider worries that they just don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

  13. Megan said

    Are they trying to protect foreigners…..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,097 other followers

%d bloggers like this: