THE TEMASEK TIMES

News and views from an unique perspective

How uncontrolled immigration can destroy a nation: A comparative case study of the Korean kingdoms of Balhae (渤海) and Silla (新羅)

Posted by temasektimes on May 1, 2012

Immigration is a double-edged sword – it can build a great and powerful nation like the United States, but can also plant the seeds of its eventual downfall too as in the case of the Western Roman empire.

Great civilizations like Tang China might have enjoyed a relative period of prosperity brought about by its open-door policy to immigrants, yet it soon declined and descended into chaos following a massive rebellion led by a barbarian general An Lushan.

Using history as a mirror, Singapore should reflect carefully on its present immigration policy which has resulted in dissatisfaction and discontentment among native Singaporeans.

While Singapore must remain open to the world, we must be extremely selective on the immigrants we accept. Unfortunately, the seemingly uncontrolled immigration in the last few years has led to many foreigners being given Singapore citizenship without truly understand what it means to be a Singaporean.

Singapore has accepted too many immigrants within too short a period of time such that there is no time at all for them to be integrated properly into local society.

Furthermore, Singaporeans have less a racial or cultural identity than the Chinese, Indians, and Filipinos and it would not be easy to assimilate them especially when there are so many of them here causing them to congregate within their own communities.

Uncontrolled immigration can easily destroy a nation as exemplified by the Korean empire of Balhae (渤海).

Balhae (698 AD – 926 AD) was founded in 698 AD from the remnants of the Korean state of Gorguryeo (高句麗) after it was conquered by a joint invasion from Tang China and Silla (新羅), another Korean state which occupied the Korean peninsula.

Balhae became a major empire in Northeast Asia and occupied southern parts of  Manchuria, Russia’s Primorsky Krai, and the northern part of the Korean peninsula.

balhaemap

This area was a volatile region with several ethnic tribes of which the Koreans were one of them. Due to historical animosities between Balhae and Silla, the Balhae kings banned the inflow of Korean immigrants from Silla and relied on immigrants from other ethnic groups instead.

(Balhae blamed Silla for “conspiring” with Tang China to destroy its predecessor state Gorguryeo)

As Balhae was a newly founded country, it adopted an open-door policy to immigrants from neighboring kingdoms and tribes including the Khitan (契丹) and Malgal (靺鞨).

Large numbers of Khitans and Malgals were allowed into Balhae and the Koreans became an ethnic minority in their own country in less than a hundred years.

Unlike the Koreans, the Khitans and Malgals were Tungesic nomads and it was impossible to integrate them fully into Korean society though the Balhae kings had implemented policies to assimilate them such as allowing inter-racial marriages between the two groups.

While the Koreans retained control of the central government and aristocracy, the administration and military became dominated by the Khitans and Malgals which soon led to social conflicts and civil wars between them.

During the last years of the Balhae kingdom, it was wrecked by endless internal turmoils, ethnic strifes and civil wars between the various races in the empire and it was eventually conquered by the Khitan kingdom of Liao in 926 AD.

Like Singapore, Balhae was a country built out of nowhere. Though its southern portion was a remnant of Gorguryeo, its northern territory were entirely virgin lands not ruled by any state before.

The Balhae kings realized that their fledging nation would not stand a chance against its powerful neighbor China or its more populous Korean cousin Silla if it did not open its door to immigrants to increase its population.

Unfortunately, they failed to appreciate the fact that while immigrants may spur economic growth and increase a country’s military strength within a short period of time, social unrest and strife will ensue if the newcomers are not wholly integrated into local society.

Though Balhae was able to achieve rapid growth and prosperity a few decades after its founding due to the influx of immigrants, it sowed the seeds for its eventual demise.

Balhae was the largest and perhaps one of the richest states in the history of Korea, but also its shortest-lived, existing for barely more than 200 years when compared to other more ethnically and culturally homogenous states like Gorguryeo (700 + years), Baekje (700 +), Silla (900 +), Goryeo (300 +) and Joseon (600 +).

Silla (53 BC – 935 AD) was a nation of immigrants like Balhae and Singapore too, built by gradual conquest and assimilation of neighboring statelets and tribes but at a much controlled pace than Balhae which explained its political longevity of nearly a thousand years.

threekoreankingdoms

[Three Kingdom era of Korea 53 AD – 668 AD, Source: Wikipedia]

The name of Silla in Hanja – 新羅, means to “cast a net far and wide to accept talents from all over the world”. From the beginning of its existence, Silla was one of the most open nations in East Asia at that time.

Being the weakest and smallest state on the Korean peninsula compared to Gorguryeo in the north and Baekje (百濟) to the west, the Silla kings had long realized the importance of immigration in order to survive.

Though Silla was able to grow and prosper by keeping its door open to immigrants, it practised a highly selective immigration policy unlike that of Balhae.

Silla welcomed only certain ethnic races which were closer to them in terms of language, culture and bloodline and not those who were further apart.

For example, when the Gaya confederacy (加倻) was conquered in 562 AD, its people who were closely linked to the Silla Koreans were completely accepted as Silla citizens and they eventually become assimilated into Silla society, one of whom became the great Korean general Kim Yu-Shin who conquered the other two kingdoms and united Korea.

However, the Japanese (Wa) and those with mixed Silla/Japanese heritage were evicted from their settlements along the southeastern coast of Korea and sent back to Japan as they were deemed “culturally distant” and “unsuitable” for permanent residence in Silla.

Furthermore, while Silla maintained an open-door policy to Korean immigrants from Baekje and Gorguryeo, Chinese, Khitans, Malgals and other races were deliberately kept out. They were allowed to trade with Silla, but could never become its citizens.

Such a targeted immigration policy enabled Silla to increase its population via immigration and ensuring the “ethnic compatibility” of its people at the same time.

Though there were many ethnic minorities in Silla, they were culturally and linguistically linked to the original Silla Koreans thereby maintaining a largely homogenous society.

There were few ethnic strifes or conflicts during Silla’s long history unlike Balhae whose fault-lines were exposed within a hundred years of its founding leading to political instability and its eventual downfall.

Balhae was the last Korean state to hold any territory on Manchuria. There are still a sizable number of ethnic Koreans living in northeast China and Russia’s Maritime province today, but few will remember the existence of Balhae.

Will Singapore end up like Balhae one day? We are now fifty years old. When Balhae was fifty years old, it was a major economic powerhouse in the region (northeast Asia) like Singapore (southeast Asia) and it was also the same period of time when it became  swarmed by immigrants.

If a country the size of Balhae which was about the size of France could implode and destroy itself in only 200 years, why not Singapore?

Singapore should learn from the targeted immigration policy adopted by Silla and focused on getting immigrants who can integrate more easily into our society such as those from the southern provinces of China, Hong Kong and Taiwan of which a basic command of the English language is a must instead of accepting everybody indiscriminately like Balhae without studying if they are culturally, ethnically and linguistically compatible with native Singaporeans in the first place.

History has given us one important lesson of how uncontrolled immigration can destroy a nation. We must take heed before it is too late.

References:

1. An English translation of the Samguk Sagi from Seoul National University

2. Wikipedia

Note: This article was first published in the old Temasek Review in March 2010.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Related articles:

Address the real causes of low fertility rate instead of taking in more immigrants

Exposing the 6 major flaws in the PAP’s immigration policy

Why the present wave of immigration is different from the past

15 Responses to “How uncontrolled immigration can destroy a nation: A comparative case study of the Korean kingdoms of Balhae (渤海) and Silla (新羅)”

  1. Please think in depth, please learn in depth n not just copy said

    Please think in depth, please learn in depth n not just copy

    In USA, in year1924 when immigration act was passed, anti-immigrant reaction reached the highest point. Immigrant from Asia or Africa were not allowed.

    Races is one of the key component in immigration policy, it is because “blending different races ” is more difficult than “blending the same race”. It is a simple logic, and i believe our smart Minister and MP should know about it.

    It is not only Singapore have immigrant problem, many country face the problem. Why can we learn from other country, or are we learning the right thing or just copy and do it?

    China had faced racial problem, that ended up during Yuan Dynasty, Ming Dynasty, Qing Dynasty were governed by other race and not “Hang” race!

    A good and responsible leader is not just leading and ignoring the managing problems. To lead, it is good for bringing in more people, but how to manage is one important thing. In short, a good leader must know how to manager, but a good manager may not how to lead!

    I had seen minister like to come out idea, but they put up “sweeping statement” like we want foreigner talents. What is the total number of talents we need? What type (mechanical engineering, architect, etc….) of talent we need? How many year to stop getting in for different talents? Is there a way to get foreign talent to train our local? etc… I do not think they justify for the high pay of being a minister.

  2. In 100 years to come, Singapore will become the world class case study in the area of immigration policy study.

  3. abigail said

    No need to look so far away just look our neighbour Malaysia.. They’re having problems with their Chinaman citizens just like us with the PRCs.

  4. What? said

    Let me be the devil’s advocate here:

    This is ancient history, incompatible with modern economic and migration patterns and results.

    Singapore’s immigration policy will avoid the pitfalls of these ancient kingdoms as we are based on desire to hoard riches and admit those who display traits of greed and disloyalty. We will do better than the Balhaes.

    • Native S'porean said

      There is a saying that “history will repeat itself again”…
      I am not confident that S’pore will do better, anyway I have already bought my insurance and become a PR in a real 1st world country.
      Let those 60.1% sink together with S’pore and those 39.9% who still think that S’pore is still in good hands, still has a bright future or still hope for a better tomorrow!

  5. skponggol said

    “History has given us one important lesson of how uncontrolled immigration can destroy a nation. We must take heed before it is too late.”

    Yeah right.

    Look at USA….Before Mayflower’s arrival, the people were still dancing with the wolves….Now the country is a hell, worse than North Korea, modern-dat Balhae.

  6. Zach tells you The Other Hard Truth said

    It is true that Singapore has always welcome foreign talents (I mean real talents). However the FT tsunami that is wreaking havoc on our beloved island has little to do with the economy.

    The truth is that the PAP knows its days are numbered, and more and more Singaporeans are waking up to the extent that one day it will be voted out of power. The “unsinkable Titanic” GRC scheme struck the WP iceberg, and went down most unceremoniously.

    So what to do ? If it can no longer win over the local electorate, then dilute it, pollute it, or else overwhelm it with new imports. Simple as that. That is why there will be no let-up in the intake of foreigners. In fact, there will be a hastening of making them citizens, in the hope that the balance of votes will tip in favor of the PAP, come 2016.

    All hope is not lost yet. If only half of the 60% now wakes up to reality, there is still hope for all of us.

    • fxxkyoualltwice@gmail.com said

      fyi. 60% will still be 60%. they are lackeys of pap. they are rich and benefitting from being their lackeys. dream on if you think this 60% will grow any smaller. suck thumb la!!! 😀

  7. Peter Pan said

    I can still recall one incident where a friend from China asked me this question.

    “When will Singapore be reunited with
    the motherland?”

    Motherland, meaning PR China.

    • fxxkyoualltwice@gmail.com said

      GE2016. When LHL is replaced by PRC.:D and his sugar daddy in his coffin. no energy to climb out of his damned coffin, 😀

  8. Blood suckers said

    You all think the PAP really care? They only care for their paychecks and bonuses that’s all.

    If not, alot of policies would have be reversed or even discarded.

    Instead what they are askin us to do; be more torelant. We must help them intergrate into our society. And not they must adapt to our society. We owe us (I mean, my million dollar paycheck) depends on them.

    • fxxkyoualltwice@gmail.com said

      then why did your parents and your frens still vote for them? you sow what you reap.

  9. Alamak! said

    the problem is that PAP seldom admits its mistakes. Everybody knows that we are continually facing emigration and low birth-rate problems. The government thought the best way is to open our floodgates. But they are coming in too fast to be comfortable. Singapore is now flooded with foreigners (close to 40% now). The fact is that we are not getting the top-tier talents from other countries. Most of them are 2nd or 3rd-tier or worse. But it’s too late to reverse the situation. By the time PAP is voted out of power, Singapore would have been destroyed by such botched-up immigration policies.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.