Straits Times downplayed anti-PRC sentiments among Singaporeans in New York Times article
Posted by temasektimes on July 30, 2012
The New York Times carried an article last Friday on the rise of anti-PRC sentiments among Singaporeans with the headlines “In Singapore, Vitriol against Chinese newcomers”
The same article was published in the Straits Times today with a different title “Singapore’s unique immigration woes’ to make it sound more politically correct:
THE TEMASEK TIMES 
Martin said
The ‘unique’ thing is this immigration issues has now reached boiling point. The only ‘non-unique’ thing is our multi-million dollars ministers and Shitty Times trying to whitewash woes and continue to project their efficient image to the world.
christianpasti204747594 said
New York Times seems to have crossed the line this time…
Goh Tong Seng said
New York Times is a press company in America, the worlds largest immigration nation. That country fought the Nazis. They seen the worst in anti-immigration. They vowed it should never happen again, anywhere in the world. That is why Americans and American press do not take well to such anti-foreign sentiment, wherever it may be.
Mod’s note:
There’s a difference between xenophobia and cultural genocide.
Goh Tong Seng said
The US was, and still is, the largest immigration country in the world.
The reason why they are pro-immigration is because they battled the Nazis. They learnt from history. So they won’t repeat it.
enough said
chinawoman are homewreckers, leechers,
they breakup familises by seducing old man
they leech old man by conning him of his accumulated wealth
and then they run off back to china
just look at the number of cases
the woman whose daughter was murdered by a malaysian, she siphoned all the money from the donations by singaporean
to build a mansion back in China
singaporeans, tell me whose homes had been wrecked by chinawoman
how many man had been cheated by chinawoman
throughout the whole world, chinawoman are notorious for being a gold digger
In taiwan, Malaysia, Singapore, thailand, Austraila , NZ , USA Canada
they exhibit the same traits, greed
i adivsed all man to keep away from these hookers, they are nothing but hooker
if you choose to do othewise, you are in peril
kaypoh said
Eh, I thot the underaged pros was Sporean? the corksuckers for contract oso Sporean? the sex-in-RI Sporean?
My God, so Murdoch married one? Our Olympic flag carrier oso one?
OMG and I thot the leeches were MIW all along!
Thanks for opening my eyes!
enough said
do y
SINYoobi said
Well said. These women from China lacks INTEGRITY, MORALS, LOVE, SOCIAL VALUES, and the list goes on. They are shameless FREELOADERS who only worship MONEY.
Dogmeat said
“Unique immigration woes” is a better name. “Vitriol” is one sided and implied that the locals are not justified when they describe thrash as thrash.
Goh Tong Seng said
Read my response on why America does not like anti-immigrant sentiment.
I am DAFT so WHAT ! said
Which side is the one-sided? Objectivity is of same sides of both sides, friend. So point here is it balanced and fair – nothing to do with what others. especially they are another part of the globe, think, feel or do which has got no relation to what happens here.
Goh Tong Seng said
The Americans fought the Nazis. They have seen the worst. They have vowed to not let it or something similar happen again, anywhere in the world. That is why their press do not take well to anti-immigrant sentiment.
Dogmeat said
Singapore does not share the same value system and political correctness as America. We are pragmatic, what is right is whatever that will protect and preserve the country. You need not argue that US has lots more problems than Singapore caused by their breed of “lowest-common-denominator”, stupidity based democracy.
Goh Tong Seng said
This is not ’bout America’s problems. This is ’bout the reason why The New York Times phrased it the way it was.
enough said
do you know the history of rupert murdoch wife
first when she was a young girl in china, she could not even speak a word of English
she then met an american couple holidaying in China, got the american couple to sponsored her to learn English
in America
she stayed in the couple home, seduced the dirty old man , got the old man to dump the old cow
old hag divorced the old cow, married her, and when she got the green pass, dumped the old hag
and married another bloke
to cut the story short, met rupert the old hag, seduced him to divorced his wife of over 3 decades and quickly got
rupert ot f k her to produce kids to inherit his empire
now she got a substantial amount of empire under her thumb and is wrestling control of the empire from rupert
children of the first marriage
this is a typical example of how greedy is chinawoman, absolutely shameless,
i say what i think only... said
chinese entrepreneur. alibaba took pains to get listed, this woman go by backdoor listing by taking over a listed one. even smarter
陳一峯 said
PRC is not welcome anywhere outside china as long as there are air. although we are majority chinese, but they are not welcome in all chinese community besides the mainlands.
I am DAFT so WHAT ! said
The ST is dping itself a massive disfavour because what they are doing is by downplaying it, in a way catching only the UNEDUCATED, UNINFORMED – thereby pushing aside those WHO KNOWS the reality, and those who knows the reality ARE NOT simpletons.
And when this process continues in this manner and has been, the intellectuals and knows better WOULD go elsewhere, NATURALLY.
And thus ST has fcccked their OWN arses because the VERY fact that they are doing this has DRIVEN the intellectuals WHOM they MUST have NEEDED to stay and read the Shit Times, IF NOT for the adverisements of jobs, and products sales.
So this is simple EQ and simple MANAGEMENT ideas/execution.